Nixon: 1969-74 |
NOTE: this topic is listed in the OCR specification. It is NOT a stated topic on the AQA specification. |
President Richard Nixon was a complex and contradictory character. His presidency ended in disgrace and resignation after the Watergate Scandal (when he was exposed not only as having illegally funded his campaigns, but of authorising the burglary of the Democrats' HQ when he thought they had found out, and then lying about it all to Congress and the public): Source A"Nixon is a no good, lying bastard. He can lie out of both sides of his mouth at the same time, and if he ever caught himself telling the truth, he'd lie just to keep his hand in." Former President Harry S. Truman, speaking in 1960.
|
Going DeeperThe following link will help you widen your knowledge: Interpretations of Nixon - a historiography
|
Nixon's Domestic Programme [ESCAPE]
|
Consider:List all the aspects of Nixon's Welfare Programme. What do you reckon to it? Now read the historians' ideas of Nixon, and discuss whether they have changed your personal interpretation.
|
InterpretationsThis is a summary – for the full article see here. James Burns’s 2005 summary of Nixon as “brilliant and morally lacking” shows the difficulty historians face in interpreting this complex figure, resulting in a range of different ideas. Even before Watergate, historian Arthur Schlesinger criticized Nixon’s misuse of power, blaming it on the unchecked growth of presidential authority since WWII. Other people, like the psycho-historians of the 1970s, labelled Nixon as psychologically damaged, even psychopathic, and in 2000 journalist Anthony Summers painted him as drunkard wife-beater, though such views are now discredited. Nixon himself portrayed his career as a series of battles, through which he overcame setbacks through determination. A few biographers have praised his resilience, and defended his actions – even Watergate. Critics have argued that Nixon was a cynical pragmatist, caring only about political gain rather than principles. In the 1990s, historians like Herbert Parmet and Stanley Kutler suggested that his reforms were merely schemes to outmanoeuvre liberals, while others saw his appeals to the ‘silent majority’, and his support for environmental reforms and the Family Assistance Plan, merely as a ploy for votes. At the same time, however, other historians were reassessing Nixon as a liberal. Tom Wicker and Joan Hoff highlighted his progressive policies, and a former aide explained that any contradictory actions stemmed from the political reality that his voters were conservative. LLater, David Greenberg and John Farrell portrayed Nixon as a shape-shifter, constantly adapting his image to the needs of the moment without fixed convictions. Keith Olsen (2011) concluded that Nixon’s presidency left a sordid legacy of mistrust; whilst law professor Cass Sunstein (2017) ranked him among the five most important presidents of all time.
|
|
|