- 1.
The Vietnam War: why the US became involved
- a.
French driven out of Vietnam, 1954
-
After 1945, the French failed to re-conquer Indo- China; the Geneva Agreement (1954) divided Vietnam into a Communist north and a ‘democratic’ south
- b.
Communist National Liberation Front, 1960
-
After 1960, the Communist National Liberation Front (the ‘Vietcong’ – VC) began a guerrilla war to try to conquer South Vietnam
- c.
Hatred of Communism
-
America was committed to ‘contain’ Communism (e.g. the McCarthy ‘witch-hunt’ of the 1950s); also the US ‘military–industrial complex’) wanted war
- d.
Domino theory
-
The Diem government of South Vietnam was unpopular and weak, but the US believed that if one country fell to communism in the region, others would follow
.
- e.
Escalation
-
Once they got involved, the USA found that they were being attacked by the VC and had to respond:
- 2.
How the US got involved: events
- a.
Thich Quang Duc, Oct 1963
-
In October 1963, a Buddhist monk named Thich Quang Duc burned himself to death in protest at the Diem government’s persecution of Buddhism
- b.
Diem was assassinated, Nov 1963
-
In November 1963, the CIA arranged a military coup, and Diem was assassinated
- c.
USS Maddox incident, 2 Aug 1964
-
The USS Maddox in the Gulf of Tonkin claimed it had been attacked by North Vietnamese torpedo boats.
- d.
Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, 7 Aug 1964
-
US Congress passed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, giving President Johnson the power to order military action
.
- e.
Operation Rolling Thunder, Feb 1965
-
After the VC attacked US air bases, Johnson ordered Operation Rolling Thunder and the USA sent increasing numbers of troops (500,000 by 1969)
- 3.
The theory of guerrilla warfare
- a.
To defeat a more powerful enemy
-
Guerrilla warfare is used by small, poorly-equipped groups fighting a more powerful enemy
- b.
On Guerrilla Warfare, 1937
-
Chinese Communist leader Mao Zedong explained: 1, get the support of the people; 2, harass and weaken the enemy; 3. drive them out in a conventional war
- c.
The only rule is no rules
-
The only rule to guerrilla warfare, said Mao Zedong, is that there are no rules
- d.
Ho Chi Min fought Japan and France
-
Ho Chi Minh used guerrilla tactics against the Japanese during the Second World War, and then to drive out the French
.
- e.
Vo Nguyen Giap defeated the USA
-
The Vietnamese military leader Vo Nguyen Giap and the North Vietnamese army (NVA) used guerrilla tactics against the Americans, 1964–1975
- 4.
Guerrilla tactics, 1964–1968: facts
- a.
Surprise attacks and sabotage
-
The VC fought in ordinary peasant pyjamas so that they could not be distinguished from the ordinary population
- b.
Cu Chi tunnels
-
After attacking, they used a vast network of tunnels to escape (e.g. the 75-mile Cu Chi network near Saigon)
- c.
Booby traps, tripwires and landmines
-
Booby traps, tripwires and landmines (e.g. ‘Bouncing Betty’)
- d.
Hanging onto the belt
-
The tactic of ‘hanging onto the belt’ – staying close to the Americans so they could not use air or artillery
.
- e.
Ho Chi Minh Trail
-
The Vietcong were supplied by China and Russia (SAM-guided missiles and MiG planes) via the Ho Chi Minh Trail supply line through Laos/Cambodia
- 5.
The US response: events
- a.
Operation Rolling Thunder, 1965–1968
-
150,000 B52 bomber raids, dropping 864,000 tonnes of bombs on places where they thought there were Vietcong units
- b.
Ia Drang, 1965
-
US Commander General William Westmoreland lured the NVA to attack American troops at Ia Drang, then destroyed them with a massive air strike
- c.
Operation Crimp, 1966
-
In 1966, Operation Crimp tried to destroy the Cu Chi tunnels by bombing, followed by a search-and-destroy raid involving 8000 troops. It failed
- d.
My Lai Massacre, 1968
-
Charlie Company of the 23rd Infantry Division, led by Second Lieutenant William Calley, went berserk and raped and massacred a Vietnamese village
.
- e.
Operation Phoenix, 1968–1972
-
The CIA arrested and interrogated suspected VC
- 6.
The US response: tactics
- a.
Bombing
-
e.g. Operation Rolling Thunder, fibre-glass cluster bombs
- b.
High-tech weapons
-
e.g. artillery, ‘hueys’ (helicopters), napalm (a petrol-based goo which burned) and Agent Orange (a defoliant to strip the leaves from the trees)
- c.
Strategic Hamlets programme
-
Hundreds of thousands of peasants were moved from Vietcong-controlled areas to live in ‘safe’ villages (which were, in effect, concentration camps)
- d.
Search-and-destroy
-
The aim of these patrols was to draw the Vietcong into an attack, when they could be destroyed by US air and artillery – they deteriorated into ‘Zippo Raids’
.
- e.
Hearts and minds
-
The US hoped to win ‘hearts and minds’ by building schools, roads and sewers, but the foreign occupation, strategic hamlets and atrocities made this impossible
- 7.
My Lai Massacre, 1968: causes
- a.
Tet Offensive, Jan–May 1968
-
The incident took place during the US counter-attack after Phase I of the Tet offensive – i.e. in a battle situation
- b.
Hiding the 48th guerrillas
-
US army intelligence believed that the Son My villagers were hiding the 48th Battalion of the VC (which had attacked US forces in Quang Ngai province)
- c.
Captain Medina’s briefing
-
Medina briefed the soldiers that by 7am all the villagers would have left for market so that only VC guerrillas would be left; they were ordered to ‘wipe them out’
- d.
Young soldiers
-
The average age of US infantry was 19; particularly the inexperienced ‘cherries’ were unfit to fight the experienced and ruthless VC
.
- e.
Broken morale
-
By 1968, especially after the success of the Tet offensive, US infantry morale was broken, with drugs common and instances of fragging and ‘working it out’
- 8.
My Lai Massacre: events and aftermath
- a.
Lt Calley and Charlie Company, 16 Mar 1968
-
Calley and ‘C’ Company attacked the My Lai 4 hamlet of Son My village and massacred about 80 villagers
- b.
My Lai and My Khe
-
Other platoons, over the next two days, attacked other hamlets and killed villagers; in all 504 villagers were killed (US estimate 347)
- c.
Hugh Thompson
-
Hugh Thompson and his helicopter crew tried to prevent the massacre
- d.
Initial cover-up for the press
-
The initial press briefings claimed the company had done an ‘outstanding job’ killing ‘128 Viet Cong and 22 civilians’ during a ‘fierce fire fight’
.
- e.
Seymour Hersh, Nov 1969
-
Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh published the story of the massacre in the US, leading to Calley’s conviction
- 9.
US failures during the Vietnam War
- a.
Body count and kill ratio
-
US generals focused on ‘body count’ and ‘kill ratio’ – they made no progress towards defeating the enemy
- b.
Mistakes
-
US tactics often misfired – for instance when US bombers dropped napalm on ‘friendly’ villages by mistake
- c.
Zippo Raids
-
Search and Destroy was simply using US infantry as ‘bait’ (US morale fell); the raids often deteriorated into ‘Zippo Raids’
- d.
Atrocities
-
There were a number of atrocities (e.g. the My Lai Massacre, 1968)
.
- e.
Hearts and minds failed
-
Foreign occupation, strategic hamlets, Operation Phoenix and atrocities such as My Lai made the US hated, however many hospitals they built
- 10.
Media coverage of the war: facts
- a.
The Green Berets, 1968
-
Up to 1968, the media (e.g. the film The Green Berets with John Wayne) showed American soldiers as kind humanitarians fighting a brutal and cruel enemy
- b.
Walter Cronkite during the Tet Offensive, Jan 1968
-
Seeing Vietcong guerrillas capture the American Embassy in Saigon, TV newsman Walter Cronkite said: ‘What the hell is going on? I thought we were winning’
- c.
Life in the V Ring, Feb 1968
-
In February 1968, John Wheeler wrote Life in the V Ring, describing the hardship and anger of the American troops in Vietnam
- d.
Seymour Hersh, Nov 1969
-
Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh published the story of the My Lai massacre; it undermined the US’s ‘moral right’ to be in Vietnam
.
- e.
Credibility gap
-
A ‘credibility gap’ opened up between what the US government was saying about the war, and what the public felt about it
- 11. US protest movements, 1968–1973
- a.
Vietnam Day Committee, 1965
-
In 1965, a student group called Vietnam Day Committee held a ‘teach-in’ against the war; in 1967, 100,000 people went on a protest march to the Lincoln Memorial
- b.
Martin Luther King, 4 Apr 1967
-
In 1967, Martin Luther King opposed the war on the ground of its cost; the money should be spent on reducing poverty at home, he said
- c.
Muhammad Ali refused the draft, 28 Apr 1967
-
The Nation of Islam asked why black boys should die for a country which would not grant them equal rights; NoI member Muhammad Ali refused to be drafted
- d.
Kent State University, 1970
-
In 1970, students at Kent State University, Ohio, protested against the US bombing of Cambodia
.
- e.
War veterans, 1971
-
In 1971, war veterans went on an anti-war march, and threw away their medals
- 12.
Public reaction to My Lai: events
- a.
Initial complaints were ignored, 1968–1969
-
Thompson’s report and letters written by other witnesses to President Nixon, Senators and Army chiefs were ignored
- b.
Seymour Hersh, Nov 1969
-
Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh published the story of My Lai; the US public were horrified – it undermined the US’s ‘moral right’ to be in Vietnam
- c.
Calley’s court martial, Nov 1970
-
A number of officers were charged but only one stood trial (he was acquitted) – Calley was found guilty of murder and sentenced to hard labour for life
- d.
Nixon released Calley, Mar 1971
-
80% of Americans disapproved of Calley’s conviction, and President Nixon stepped in to reduce his sentence to 3˝ years house arrest
.
- e.
Medina standard, Aug 1971
-
Although Captain Medina was found not guilty, the court declared that a soldier, being aware of a war crime, is criminally liable (and not just his commander)
- 13.
Kent State protest, 1970: causes
- a.
Seymour Hersh, Nov 1969
-
Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh had published the My Lai story; it outraged student opinion and undermined the US’s ‘moral right’ to be in Vietnam
- b.
President Nixon’s draft lottery, Dec 1969
-
In order to reduce anger at the unfairness of the draft, Nixon had introduced a lottery system; this had led students to hope the war was coming to an end
- c.
Weathermen bombings, Mar 1970
-
Anti-Vietnam protests reached a high with a bombing campaign waged by an extreme student group called the ‘Weather Underground’
- d.
Cambodia incursion, 30 Apr 1970
-
US forces escalated the war, attacking Vietcong bases in Cambodia
.
- e.
Anti-war demonstrations, 2 May 1970
-
There were violent ant-war demonstrations at universities across the US
- 14.
Kent State protest: events
- a.
Cambodia incursion, 30 Apr 1970
-
US forces escalated the war, attacking Vietcong bases in Cambodia
- b.
Friday: Demonstration and riots, 1 May 1970
-
A peaceful demonstration of about 500 students was followed by riots that night in town; the police declared a state of emergency
- c.
Saturday: the National Guard, 2 May 1970
-
Protestors set fire to the Reserve Officer Training Crops building and stoned police and firemen; Governor Rhodes called in the National Guard
- d.
Sunday: bayonets, 3 May 1970
-
A demonstration was dispersed with tear gas; a curfew was announced and at 11pm students were forced back into their dorms at bayonet-point (some were stabbed)
.
- e.
Monday: 4 shot dead, 4 May 1970
-
When a violent crowd of 2000 refused to disperse, 29 Guardsmen fired 67 rounds into the crowd, killing four (including 2 bystanders) and wounding 9
- 15.
Kent State protest: results
- a.
Public response
-
Most Americans blamed the students; President Nixon said they were Communists; in New York construction workers held a ‘Hard Hat Riot’ in support of the war
- b.
Student strike
-
4 million students went on strike at 900 universities
- c.
Washington demonstrations, 9 May
-
100,000 people protested in Washington; the protest became so violent that the President had to go to Camp David
- d.
President’s Commission on Campus Unrest, Jun 1970
-
It found the Guardsmen guilty of indiscipline and ordered that the National Guard should never be issued with loaded rifles confronting students
.
- e.
Wisconsin bombing, Aug 1970
-
Anti-war protests became much more violent; in August 1970, a van filled with explosives was blown up at the University of Wisconsin
- 16.
The Fulbright Hearings: events
- a.
Capitol bombing, Mar 1971
-
A Weatherman bomb in the Capitol in Washington caused $300,000 damage
- b.
Veterans against the War, Apr 1971
-
Vietnam veterans camped in Washington, and threw away their medals
- c.
22 hearings on 7 proposals, Apr–May 1971
-
The Senate Foreign Relations Committee held 22 hearings on 7 proposals to withdraw from Vietnam
- d.
Fulbright’s opening remarks, 20 Apr 1971
-
The Chairman, William Fulbright, openly opposed the war, and denied the right of the president to have taken the US into the war in 1964
.
- e.
Troop withdrawals, 1972
-
After the hearings, Nixon began to withdraw troops from Vietnam; by the end of 1972, only 30,000 remained
- 17.
Why the US lost the Vietnam War
- a.
High-tech tactics
-
American high-tech tactics failed to destroy the VC guerrilla forces
- b.
8,000 miles away
-
America was fighting and supplying a war 8000 miles away
- c.
Failure to win hearts and minds
-
The South Vietnamese government was weak, brutal, corrupt and hated; the Americans’ cruelty and atrocities failed to ‘win hearts and minds’
- d.
Drugs, fragging and working it out
-
US soldiers (especially the ‘cherries’) had low morale, with US soldiers going AWOL, taking drugs, ‘fragging' (killing their officers) and ‘working it out’ (negotiating orders)
.
- e.
Opposition in America to the war
-
Particularly horror at soldiers being returned home in body bags and incidents such as the My Lai massacre and the Kent State shootings
- 18.
Why the Vietcong won the war
- a.
Vietcong guerrilla tactics
-
VC guerrilla tactics won the war
- b.
Supplies from China and Russia
-
The VC were supplied by China and Russia down the Ho Chi Minh trail
- c.
Patriotism and motivation
-
The Vietnamese were fighting a patriotic war of liberation
- d.
Ruthless and experienced soldiers
-
The VC had been at war since 1945; they were fanatically dedicated fighters, surviving horrific conditions in the tunnels
.
- e.
South Vietnamese peasants helped them
-
South Vietnamese peasants supported and helped the VC
- 19.
The Tet Offensive, 1968: facts
- a.
General Thanh’s offensive
-
VC militants, led by General Thanh, argued that the guerrilla war being waged by General Nguyen Giap was too slow, and called for a large-scale attack
- b.
Vietnamese New Year
-
The Vietcong had offered a truce for the Vietnamese New Year (Tet) celebrations, so half the South Vietnamese army (ARVN) was on leave
- c.
Tet attack, 31 Jan 1968
-
On 31 January 1968, 84,000 Vietcong troops attacked a hundred towns and cities across South Vietnam; they mounted two more attacks in May and August
- d.
Initial success – Saigon and Hue
-
At first, the attack was spectacularly successful: a 15-man suicide squad captured the American Embassy in Saigon, and Hue was captured and held for 25 days
.
- e.
Failure
-
The Americans could defeat a conventional, non-guerrilla attack; the Vietcong lost 58,000 killed, including many officers
- 20.
The Tet Offensive: results
- a.
Vietcong losses
-
The Vietcong lost 58,000 killed, including many officers
- b.
Vietcong capacity damaged
-
It was months before they could mount a military operation, and morale was damaged. The NVA declared: ‘Never again will we risk our entire army.’
- c.
South Vietnamese deaths and refugees
-
The South Vietnamese lost 14,300 civilians killed, 70,000 homes destroyed and had to cope with 627,000 refugees
- d.
American loss of confidence
-
The Americans suffered relatively light military losses, but public confidence had a huge setback, and Americans realised they would never ‘win’ the war
.
- e.
Both sides lost
-
It was the only battle that both sides lost
- 21.
US withdrawal: facts
- a.
Nixon Doctrine – Vietnamisation, 1969
-
Looking for a way out, Nixon began ‘Vietnamisation’ – i.e. leaving the war to the South Vietnamese army (the ARVN), but with US financial support
- b.
Cambodia incursion, 1970
-
US forces escalated the war, attacking Vietcong bases in Cambodia
- c.
Laos, 1971
-
US forces attacked Vietcong supply lines in Laos
- d.
The Madman theory, 1972
-
The ‘madman theory’; Nixon tried to awe the Vietnamese into peace by making them believe he was capable of anything; he mounted a huge bombing campaign
.
- e.
Paris Peace Agreement, 1973
-
The Paris Peace Agreement (negotiated by Henry Kissinger) was signed; the US withdrew, American prisoners of war were released
- 22.
Paris Peace Conference, 1973: facts
- a.
Secret peace negotiations, Aug 1969
-
Secret peace negotiations between US National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger, and North Vietnamese government member Le Duc Tho
- b.
VC Easter Offensive failed, Summer 1972
-
The VC had tried a conventional invasion which had been repulsed; the North realised it could not drive the Americans out by force
- c.
Draft Peace Agreement, Oct 1972
-
Tho made an agreement that allowed the South Vietnamese government to stay in power, but withdrew when South Vietnamese President Thieu rejected the peace
- d.
Christmas bombing campaign, Dec 1972
-
Nixon mounted a huge bombing campaign to force the North Vietnamese back to the Peace Conference (the ‘madman’ theory)
.
- e.
Paris Peace Agreement, 23 Jan 1973
-
The Paris Peace Agreement (negotiated by Henry Kissinger) was signed; the US withdrew, and American prisoners of war were released
- 23.
The fall of Saigon, 1975
- a.
Paris Peace Agreement, 23 Jan 1973
-
The Paris Peace Agreement (negotiated by Henry Kissinger) was signed; the US withdrew, and American prisoners of war were released
- b.
North Vietnamese invasion, Mar 1975
-
The NVA attacked South Vietnam (‘Campaign 275’); at first the ARVN fought back – refugees (the ‘Convoy of Tears’) fled south
- c.
Congress refused military aid, 17 Apr 1975
-
The US Congress refused to fund President Ford’s request for a $1bn military and aid package for South Vietnam
- d.
Thieu fell from power, 21 Apr 1975
-
South Vietnamese President Thieu fell from power, blaming the Americans for breaking their promise
.
- e.
Fall of Saigon, 30 Apr 1975
-
After a short war, the North Vietnamese entered Saigon – panic as Americans and pro-US Vietnamese tried to helicopter out
| |